Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 03:34

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s something you did a lot as a kid that you don’t miss now that you’re an adult?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Random Eagles notes: Bryce Huff trade perhaps signals some confidence in Azeez Ojulari - PhillyVoice
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Bruins acquire former first-round pick in trade with Blackhawks - Boston.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Bat found in Downtown Boise tests positive for rabies - KTVB
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How would you describe modern day Russian society, beyond just politics?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Scientists Bust the Anti-Aging Hype Around This Popular Supplement - bestlifeonline.com